Support

Account

Forum Replies Created

  • I found the way to fix the file field: The form html in the bootstrap modal is set from an Ajax request. At acf_form() I found the hint, that acf.do_action('append', $('#popup-id')); must be called after an Ajax request.

    With this function call in the event-listener shown.bs.modal deleting/replacing of the file works.

  • I have to correct myself. When I write link field, I mean the ACF file field. The information entered for this field is used for a download link, so I mistakenly called it Link field.

  • Hello John
    Thank you very much for the explanations and tips, that helps me a lot. I now need to think about which option is best for me to implement.

  • Hello John

    Many thanks for the advice. I have corrected the spelling mistake in is_search.

    The explanation regarding the sorting explains exactly what I see in the output of the search results after sorting by date.

    What I still don’t understand is that the sorting works when querying the two cpts on an overview page (first code section) but not in the search.

    Can I rewrite the search query so that sorting by date works or would ACF fields have to be named the same in order to enable sorting with $query->set('orderby', 'meta_value'); $query->set('meta_key', 'date_field_name');?

  • Thank you for the pointers. I will take a close look at the function on github.

    At the moment I have added another field to the field group. This field is assigned a default value and is set to read-only.
    When saving duplicated rows, the default value of the field is passed on and I can check this in the loop. It’s not a very nice solution but it seems to work.

    Before that I used your function add_filter('acf/validate_value/name='.$field_name,... to declare a field as unique. So there will always be one field unique that can be checked in the loop.

    Maybe there is a more elegant solution?

  • Hello John
    Thank you very much for the advice. The setting described is really very similar and the procedure described has brought me further.

    After thinking about it for a while over the weekend, I decided to stick with the ID field. I restarted from scratch and I could fix the problem when deleting a Row and passing the ID field (the ReadOnly code was not commented everywhere…).

    Now I stumble upon another problem. When a Row is duplicated, all values are duplicated (including the ID). So in the repeater loop an ID can appear multiple times and that makes checking what is new/edited/remained the same complicated.

    I thought that the ID field can be defined as unique according to your post (https://tinyurl.com/2dqajbcf). Or is there a way to give the Duplicate button a custom JS function to empty the input field?

    Thanks for the help.

  • I understand that well. It is certainly very difficult to understand my approach and the chosen process with my description. I will rethink everything and try again.

    Thank you for your time and advice.

  • I tested with priority 5 and 20 and it made no difference.

    I used the hook acf/validate_save_post to output $_POST in the console. Then I saved a the master again with a new child. But I can’t see a kurs_id field in the output.
    Then I did the same but gave the kurs_id field a default value of 0. Now I can see a the field in the $_POST with the default value. But in the end, this did not solve the problem either.

  • No, first it was set to read-only using ‘acf/load_field/name=kurs_id’ hook and $field['disabled'] = 1;. But this code is currently commented.

  • Hi
    Yes, it is a repeater subfield created with ACF (screenshot of the acf reapaeter). My setup is: WordPress 6.2 with roots/sage9, PHP 8.0.28 and the Plugin ACF Pro 6.1.5.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)