have_rows() not working

• dataitalia

• April 7, 2015 at 7:38 am

Hi there,
I am using acf pro version 5.2.2

I made a simple Flexible Content Field named ‘travel_gallery’ it contains 2 rows: ‘travel_text_row’ and ‘travel_photo_row’

But if I output the fields content following theses instructions nothing appears at all: http://www.advancedcustomfields.com/resources/flexible-content/
It just prints ‘no layouts found’

What I am doing wrong?

If I output <?php print_r( get_field('travel_gallery') ); ?>

I get the content: Array ( [0] => travel_text_row [1] => travel_photo_row )

<?php

// check if the flexible content field has rows of data
if( have_rows('travel_gallery') ):

     // loop through the rows of data
    while ( have_rows('travel_gallery') ) : the_row();

        if( get_row_layout() == 'travel_text_row' ):

          the_sub_field('travel_text');

        elseif( get_row_layout() == 'travel_photo_row' ): 

          the_sub_field('travel_photo');

        endif;

    endwhile;

else :

    // no layouts found
  echo 'no layouts found';

endif;

?>

Screen-Shot-....png

• dataitalia

• April 8, 2015 at 4:52 am

Any idea?

• mediawerk

• April 9, 2015 at 9:57 pm

just to get sure:
you check frontpage for a page/post/custom-post where you have some content filled at backend. either photo or text.

<?php

// check if the flexible content field has rows of data
if( have_rows('travel_gallery') ):

     // loop through the rows of data
    while ( have_rows('travel_gallery') ) : the_row();

        if( get_row_layout() == 'travel_text_row' ){
          $get_travel_text = get_sub_field('travel_text');
          echo $get_travel_text;
          echo '<br>normally above should stand the text';
        }

        if( get_row_layout() == 'travel_photo_row' ){ 
          $get_travel_photo = get_sub_field('travel_photo');
          echo $get_travel_photo;
          echo '<br>normally above should come the image';
        }

    endwhile;

else :

    // no layouts found
  echo 'no layouts found';

endif;

?>

your code look correct. but what is the result when you use mine instead?