It is really good to know that flexible layout could be a probable solution. But what I believe is, if there is a limitation in using maximum number of repeater within repeater, wouldn’t it be better to include it in the documentation? Or if there is a performance issue using repeater within repeater, wouldn’t it be better to add it to the documentation as well?
Reason for all the fields inside a repeater field is that all those fields might be used more than once. The way I have to arrange repeater fields in this case, because that is how I wanted to make it easier for client to handle content editing job. However, If I knew ‘repeater’ field has limitations, then I would have thought it differently.
I would really appreciate if you can add a note to the documentation saying that using repeater inside repeater would sometime not work, as it would help other developers planning their work.
Welcome to the Advanced Custom Fields community forum.
Browse through ideas, snippets of code, questions and answers between fellow ACF users
Helping others is a great way to earn karma, gain badges and help ACF development!