I think I may be on to something here.
In my example, my
custom_field is a grouping/sub field under another field
If I get the output of:
print_r( get_field_object( 'custom_fields' ) );
Then I see the correct key => value designation for the sub_field choices.
If I get the output of just the
print_r( get_field_object( 'custom_fields_custom_field' ) ); //Using custom_fields_custom_field because custom_fields is a group
The we are back to the incorrect value => value relationship for the field.
Is this because I am trying to get the value of the sub_field?
Welcome to the Advanced Custom Fields community forum.
Browse through ideas, snippets of code, questions and answers between fellow ACF users
Helping others is a great way to earn karma, gain badges and help ACF development!