I think I may be on to something here.
In my example, my custom_field is a grouping/sub field under another field custom_fields.
If I get the output of:
print_r( get_field_object( 'custom_fields' ) );
Then I see the correct key => value designation for the sub_field choices.
If I get the output of just the custom_field:
print_r( get_field_object( 'custom_fields_custom_field' ) ); //Using custom_fields_custom_field because custom_fields is a group
The we are back to the incorrect value => value relationship for the field.
Is this because I am trying to get the value of the sub_field?
